Strategic choices for great nations

CGTN Published: 2018-07-18 18:07:25
Comment
Share
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn

By Chen Jiahe

From individuals to companies to nations, everyone needs strategic choices. There are always the right strategies versus wrong strategies. The former brings prosperity, and the latter brings mediocrity.

The national flag of the United Stated seen outside the US Consulate General at Furstatskaya Street in St Petersburg.[File Photo: VCG]

The national flag of the United Stated seen outside the US Consulate General at Furstatskaya Street in St Petersburg.[File Photo: VCG]

Sadly, it is only the wise that can tell the differences between the two, before the consequences of choices become a reality.

The United States is now picking some "obviously" correct strategies. However, if you know enough about history, you shall be able to discover the problems.

As far as I know, none of the great nations in history were forged through these types of strategies, nor was today’s United States built this way.

Other countries are now gradually being blocked from trading freely with the United States. This phenomenon is claimed as a means of  "earning money for the American people".

However, this theory clearly forgets one thing, that the gold standard has been abandoned for tens of years. This means money is no longer "money".

Today's money is not the natural rare gold. Today's global currency is mainly dominated by the United States dollar, something that has almost no intrinsic value at all.

As long as the United States is the leader of this world, American people do not have to earn this money, they can just print it. The keeping of the dominant position of the nation is a much more important task for the US, than earning money from the market.

Looking back at history, you can find the causes behind the United States' leading global position today.

Its contribution to world wars, its generous economic gesture after the war that was represented by the Marshall Plan, the world's largest free market for decades, its creative invention of its marvelous technology industry, etc.

None of this was earned with methods like adding tariffs to earn back money.

When politicians now claim that they will bring jobs back to America by adding tariffs, they are making another big mistake. What kind of jobs can be earned back by adding tariffs? You don't bring programming jobs back to the states by adding a tariff to foreign-produced computers or mobile systems.

There are only four dominant operating systems in the world, Windows, Mac OS, Android and iPhone OS. None of these are produced outside of the United States, so tariffs have nothing to do with relevant jobs.

What kind of jobs can be brought back by adding tariffs? Well, the cloth making jobs, the steel production jobs, the agricultural jobs, etc.

Is the United States' economy great in the 21st century because it produces a lot of good cloth, steel, and food, or is it because it has the world's best technology industry?

Regarding the technology industry, American's policymakers are now also choosing another thoughtless strategy with its immigration policy. Claiming that jobs shall be kept for the Americans and technology secrets shall not be leaked, the government is now tightening its acceptation of immigrants and international workers.

However, the decision makers seem to forget that it was just the "untrustworthy foreigners" who built a great part of the Silicon Valley.

In 1999, over one-third of the high technology workers in the Silicon Valley were foreigners. If you restrict the calculation to those who worked in the Silicon Valley and had PhD degrees, the number was over 50 percent.

If the immigration policy that we see today was conducted in the 1990s, the United States might not have such a great technology industry at all, which brings the nation the most profitable part of the global trade.

From Rome to the Tang Dynasty, none of the world's greatest nations were built through rejecting their neighbors and closing their gates. Not cooperating and isolation are actions of the scared and great nations do not scare.

It was free markets and creative people that pushed forward our civilizations and built great nations. The policymakers who forget about these principles will definitely make inaccurate strategic choices.

Editor's note: Chen Jiahe is a chief strategist at Cinda Securities, Oxon. The article reflects the author's opinion, and not necessarily the views of ChinaPlus.

Related stories

Share this story on

Columnists

LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.