Tariff threats are not the way forward to solve trade issues

China Plus Published: 2019-06-28 01:04:48
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn

Note: The following article is taken from the Chinese-language "Commentaries on International Affairs".

The heads of state of China and the United States are scheduled to meet in Osaka on the sidelines of the G20 summit. Ahead of their meeting, the US authorities have once again threatened to impose additional tariffs on Chinese products if the two sides cannot reach an agreement on trade issues. Such a move by the US is no way to solve trade disputes.

[File Photo: IC]

[File Photo: IC]

China has consistently believed in resolving the trade issues through dialogue on the basis of equality while addressing the reasonable concerns of each party. China has conducted 11 rounds of high-level consultations with the US side since last year. China came to the trade talks pledging its utmost efforts and with the highest sincerity. The two sides did make a lot of progress. However, the US side made three U-turns on their promises and continued to escalate the trade tensions through tariffs, which caused grave setbacks to the trade negotiations.

While advocating dialogue on an equal footing in solving the trade issues, China also believes that there are principles to be observed in any cooperation and there is a bottom line that cannot be crossed. Since May, the US has increased tariffs on 200 billion dollars’ worth of Chinese products and put new restrictions on Chinese enterprises doing business in America. China responded by imposing additional tariffs on US products and announcing the plan to establish a list of unreliable entities. China’s government also said that it wouldn’t tolerate foreign high-tech products made from rare earths produced in China being used to contain and suppress the country’s development. These resolute measures have clearly demonstrated China’s will and determination to safeguard its national core interests. The US side should not make any misjudgment on this respect.

China and the US are now highly intertwined with each other in their common interests. The two economies are also highly complementary to each other. Both sides stand to lose in continuing the trade war. There can be no winner. But they have a lot to gain if they choose to cooperate. There’s plenty of evidence to show that it is the US importers who will pay for the higher tariffs, rather than Chinese exporters. The Wall Street Journal has reported that the US imports 82 percent of its mobile phones from China, 94 percent of its laptop computers, 85 percent of its tricycles and scooters as well as 98 percent of its games consoles. And that is why at the recent public hearing in Washington DC, 303 out of the 314 representatives from various industrial sectors in the US voiced their opposition to the Trump administration's proposed additional tariffs of up to 25 percent on some 300 billion U.S. dollars' worth of Chinese imports. Stephen Roach, a senior fellow at Yale University, recently put his finger on it, by saying that the US government has a "basic misunderstanding of how tariffs work".

Earlier this month, the Japanese government published a white paper on trade, which sounded alarm bells over trade protectionism and pointed out that excessive trade restriction measures will hinder global economic growth. It has called on countries to show restraint. In fact, this also echoes the call and concern of most other G20 members as they gather in Osaka for the summit at this critical time. It should not be forgotten that the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, formally known as the United States Tariff Act, which raised U.S. import duties, caused the amount of international trade to decline by over 60 percent worldwide in the 1930s. It turned an economic slow-down into a massive recession. Today US tariffs are again causing pain for many G20 economies. As such, it is only right that G20 members should choose to support multilateralism and oppose unilateralism, support openness and inclusiveness and oppose protectionism.

There is only one way for China and the United States to reach an agreement and that is through a dialogue of equals. China will never succumb to the threats of additional tariffs.

Related stories

Share this story on


LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.