After initially friendly talks between China's President Xi and America's President Trump when the latter was newly elected, how did this trade spat become so fierce, so fast? What is the true motive of the United States? And how long will it last?
US President Donald Trump is on record saying that "trade wars are good and easy to win" and that he's a "very stable genius."
There appears to be no relationship between the value of the Yuan and the trade between the US and China.
One of the American complaints is that the U.S. has a huge trade deficit with China, and as a result it has suffered a loss. But is it true – has the U.S. really suffered because of its trade with China?
Coordinated, multilateral action is needed to deal with the massive threat posed by cyber crime. Because when it comes to cyber crime, the only people who benefit from a unilateralist approach are the criminals.
A White Paper issued by the Chinese government lays out the facts about the China-US trade frictions and points a way forward to resolve the dispute.
Notwithstanding if Trump is going to be successful or not, putting corporate America's operations in China on the chopping board as a retaliatory means is precisely what Trump intends to achieve.
The bigger the trade partner is, the greater its currency's weight will be. The trade-weighted method of calculation is theoretically a truer value of a currency relative to others because it represents the actual cost of exports and imports.
Revitalizing the multilateral trading system and promoting the sustainable development of global prosperity will require major world economies to agree on three things.
As long as economic globalization continues to move forward, innovation can continue to thrive, and we can all hope for a better life in a more developed future.
The U.S.-China trade dispute has bought to the fore several weighty issues about how the global trading system works.
The convincing progress in China will undoubtedly support the world multilateral mechanisms and help fight off a possible world trade and economic downturn.
The Trump administration could better achieve its laudable goal of protecting American workers by finding less problematic ways of doing so.
The essence of Sino-US economic and trade is mutual benefit and win-win cooperation. Cooperation is the only correct choice for both sides.
Trump's vague trade demands confuse not only China, but also other major US trading partners that have been targeted.
Continually advancing reform and opening up is a consensus among the Chinese government and all levels of society.
If the talks are conducted with realistic and pragmatic propositions, reasonable achievements can still be expected although much-observed apathy and indifference from the US as shown in Trumps' tweet: "If we meet, we meet?"
Could it be that it has double standards in relation to the protection of human rights? Whereby it only protects the civil rights of its own people, and is happy to randomly abuse the human rights of civilians from other countries?
US manufacturing production reached its all-time peak in 2007. Employment in US manufacturing began to decline even before the peak. Therefore, whether measured in terms of production or of employment, no expansion of US manufacturing has taken place.
Under the guidance and leadership of the two heads of state, the social and public opinion base of Sino-Russian friendship is becoming more and more solid.