Trans-Siberian railway – expectations and realities

China Plus Published: 2017-10-18 10:54:37
Comment
Share
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn
By Timofey Bakhvalov

The Trans-Siberia Railway (Transsib) transport corridor is fast becoming a new point of trade growth between China and Europe. How is this possible in a highly competitive global environment, and at a time when the tariffs for sea freight have reached an historic minimum? 

The answer is obvious – railway container transportation is faster. But major problems and obstacles remain and for the last decade changes have been insignificant. Fundamental problems linger, such as unconfirmed and non-unified legal norms, complicated customs clearance, differences in gauge (railway track width), undeveloped infrastructure and insufficient electrification of railways etc.

A photo showing the 26th Congress of the Trans-Siberian Transportation (CCTT) Plenary Meeting held in Beijing. [Photo provided by Timofey Bakhvalov]

A photo showing the 26th Congress of the Trans-Siberian Transportation (CCTT) Plenary Meeting held in Beijing. [Photo provided by Timofey Bakhvalov]

More than 250 delegates from 22 countries and regions took part in the 26th Congress of the Trans-Siberian Transportation (CCTT) Plenary Meeting which was recently held in Beijing. They were heads and representatives of transport ministries, railways, seaports, shipping companies, leading transport, logistics, insurance, security and IT companies and key international transport organizations – UNECE, CIT, UIC, FIATA etc.

Top of the agenda was the functioning and development of the Trans-Siberian transport corridor and improvements in container transportation efficiency between the countries of Europe, Baltic, Central Asia and the Asia-Pacific Region.

Alexander Misharin, first vice-president of the Russian Railways Company, said that the volume of railway transportation between China and Europe is constantly growing mainly because of rapid e-commerce development. By 2020 global e-commerce volume will exceed 4 trillion US Dollars. So there's a huge demand for new systems and instruments: electronic trains, electronic customs declarations, etc. It's now not just about delivery from point to point, but about providing "all-in-one" services including "last mile" delivery.

In 2016, the transit flow of China-Russia-Europe through all customs checkpoints increased by 89% – up to 154 thousand TEU. 25% of all containers passing through Transsib is China-Europe-China traffic. For the first 8 months of 2017, 482 thousand TEU were already transported. This is 1.5 times more than in the same period of 2016.

As we see, the volume dynamics of the Transsib transit seems positive. But the increase in volume is not a result of efficient performance and new business models. It is a result of huge subsidies provided by the central and local governments of China. Notice – not Russia, but the Chinese government. But subsidies will not last forever…

To make Transsib more efficient it's necessary to improve infrastructure, increase the diversity and quality of services, introduce flexible tariffs, etc. Russian Railways plans the modernization to increase Transsib's total capacity by 60 million tons in 2018. 

Alexander Misharin said that the future of China-Russia-Europe transit lies in increasing the speeds of the Trans-Siberian Railways segment. By reaching speeds of 200-250 km/h or even 300-350 km/h, cargo could be delivered from anywhere in China to any point in Europe within 3 days. By the year 2025 the rise of transit traffic must be 7 – 10 million tons year after year.

Transforming Transsib to high speed in 7 years? Surely we can consider such a statement as some kind of "far-reaching designs and plans". But let's see the truth – Transsib will never be "High-Speed". And here's why.

Let's take a well-known project – the "Moscow and Kazan" high-speed railway, with a length of 762 km. The project was announced by President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, on May 27th 2013. As yet it's still in the design stage and it's planned that construction will start in 2018 and will be commissioned in 2023. It's important to note that the "Moscow – Kazan" region is well developed and the climate is relatively mild for Russia. But the costs of high speed rail have already been put at at least USD 23 million per kilometer. Also, the total length of the Transsib is 9289 km. High-Speed Transsib is simply unfeasible. USD 260 billion was the total on-budget expenditure of Russia in 2017.

The deputy general director of "Chinese Railways," Wu Yuntian, called Transsib a key element of the "One belt, one road" initiative. After 5 years of development, trains to Europe depart from 33 cities of China. But the rapid growth of goods supply from China to Europe is a certain threat to the EU market. Balance is very hard to achieve because of protectionism and the unwillingness of certain European countries to have a constructive dialogue and lack of reforms. It is a bottleneck for the efficiency of the whole Transsib. The gauge remains a key problem, and there will never be a unified standard for Eurasian transportation for objective reasons.

The development of the Transsib transportation corridor is possible only by improving and digitizing services. The electronic workflow system of the Transsib is already connected with the national systems of 12 countries. But it is still not integrated with the systems of Mongolia and China – another big task.

The whole route of rail container transportation must be optimized according to local and international schedules. Transsib needs "seamless" transit corridors and integration with national railway networks, logistics centers and intermodal terminals. The future of the China-Russia-Asia direction through Transsib is also in the development of a multimodal transportation system – combining railroads, sea, air and roads. It's vitally important to provide comprehensive services (including financial) and improve the "last mile" delivery.

It will require huge investments and resources – economical and political. Experts of CCTT admit that achieving those goals "at a basic level" will take at least 10 years.

(Timofey Bakhvalov, LLM, Business consultant and analyst)

Related stories

Share this story on

Columnists

LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.