Learning lessons from Huawei's countermeasure

China Plus Published: 2019-05-19 15:44:38
Comment
Share
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn

Note: The following article is taken from the Chinese-language "Commentaries on International Affairs"

On Thursday, the U.S. Department of Commerce, without any valid evidence, put Chinese technology firm Huawei and its 70 affiliates on an “Entity List,” which prohibited Huawei from purchasing components or technologies from U.S. companies. Such a move was clearly aimed at obstructing the development of China’s high-tech sector by strangling Huawei and securing America’s hegemony in the global sci-tech sector.

Logo of Huawei [File photo: IC]

Logo of Huawei [File photo: IC]

However, what surprised Washington is that Huawei immediately announced plans to use backup chips it had been independently developing for years to ensure strategic security and a steady supply chain of most of its products. This represents a fantastic fight back against the ‘strangling’ moves made by the U.S. side and is thanks to Huawei’s spirit of hard work and innovation, along with the company’s farsightedness and vigilance against potential dangers in times of peace.

As the world’s largest telecom-equipment manufacturer, after more than 20 years of development across the globe, Huawei’s services and products are being used in 170 countries, serving over one-third of the world’s population. However, its development path in the U.S. has been rough and rugged. Many of its acquisition projects were obstructed, and the company was also probed for posing so-called “national security risks.” The door for Huawei to join the internet infrastructure construction in the U.S. with local operators has remained firmly shut.

The U.S. has been anxious about the fact that Huawei tops the global list of patent applications in 5G network construction and has declared that “the race to 5G is a race that America must win”. Although the U.S. side has claimed that it wants to win through competition instead of blocking out advanced technologies, its deeds do not match its words. The U.S. has been using the concept of “national security” as a tool to promote trade protectionism, and has taken various measures, including political kidnapping, to curb Huawei’s access to 5G network construction across the world.

However, its latest moves not only won’t make America safer or stronger, but have instead harmed Huawei’s American partners, resulting in huge job losses and undermining the global supply chain. Shares of some of Huawei’s partners, such as Qualcomm and Xilinx, fell sharply after the U.S. restrictions were announced. Leaders from European countries, including French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have made it clear that they will not blindly follow the U.S. steps to block Huawei. These are clear signs of public outrage against the U.S. arbitrary moves to crush competitors through the abuse of national power.

Huawei deserves a thumbs-up for having foreseen those potential ‘strangling’ measures over a decade ago and been preparing for just such a worst-case scenario. The launch of backup plans demonstrates the company’s vigilant stance against potential dangers, as well as its resolve and tenacity to overcome difficulties and challenges.

Such a spirit is not only typical of Chinese enterprises, but also of the Chinese nation. Since it was founded 70 years ago, the People’s Republic of China has handled a series of combat and suppression threats from the outside world. The country successfully produced atom and hydrogen bombs and a satellite on its own to cope with nuclear blackmail, and overcame difficulties to produce its homegrown microchips in the face of a technological blockade. Guided by the principle of “hope for the best and prepare for the worst”, China and its people have turned a series of dangers into advantage.

China is now closer to and more confident and capable than ever before of making the goal of national rejuvenation a reality. It also knows that achieving that goal will not be a walk in the park, but instead requires even harder work, as well as vigilance against worst-case scenarios. Huawei’s exemplary strategy is making a greater number of Chinese people further aware of the potential dangers in times of peace, and more resolved to tackle tough issues head-on.

Related stories

Share this story on

Columnists

LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.