Defeat the U.S. containment with the Long March spirit

China Plus Published: 2019-05-27 21:54:23
Comment
Share
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn

Note: The following article is taken from the Chinese-language "Commentaries on International Affairs".

The Long March of the Red Army is considered by most observers as one of the most important events of the 20th Century, as it ultimately influenced the direction China was going to take in the future. The march through rugged wilderness by dedicated soldiers is a human epic full of ideals and dedication, written with will and courage. Today, with China being the world's second largest economy, the effects of a "new Long March" will also be far-reaching as the nation adopts the spirit of the original Long March to achieve national rejuvenation.

National flags of China and the United States. [File photo: IC]

National flags of China and the United States. [File photo: IC]

The challenges being imposed by the United States on China have entered a new phase. Washington appears relentless in its efforts to cripple China's top tech companies, while at the same time, wooing or coercing its allies to take sides, all in an attempt to deter China's technological development. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has become Washington's point man in the crusade, saying that he's been "explaining the risks" to national security associated with Chinese tech firm Huawei as he travels around the world and meets with various government leaders. Statistics from China's Research Institute for Machinery Industry show that as of May 17th, over 260 Chinese companies have been added to the U.S. Entity List, making up around 22 percent of all foreign firms now under U.S. export controls.

The Trump administration's ultimate goal appears clear. It is continuing to impose extreme pressure on Beijing by cutting supplies to Chinese companies and their affiliated foreign firms as a pressure tactic, as U.S.-China trade negotiations have yet to generate any concrete results. But in making this move, Washington is grossly underestimating China's innovation capability, as well as the Long March spirit embedded in the Chinese people to motivate themselves. Such spirit is not only epitomized in China's space industry, where rockets are named after the Long March, but also in the will of the Chinese people to unite around a national cause. Faced with external pressure, the people of China have proven through history that they are willing to place national interests above all else. The people of China will not hesitate to make any sacrifice and overcome any obstacle through strength-of-unity in order to achieve the goals of the country.

China's history has helped shape its future. Nearly 180 years ago, China felt the pain of national humiliation during the First Opium War, through which the people of China drew lessons. The pain of being robbed of national dignity by a foreign power forced the Chinese to look inside themselves to rediscover the pride that comes with the pursuit of national prosperity. Only a few generations after that setback, China re-emerged on the world stage with the development of its first atomic bomb, hydrogen bomb and artificial satellite. The reform and opening-up drive over the past four decades has provided the tools, and the spirit, that China needed to become the economic power that it is today.

Pursuing scientific and technological progress, and sharing those achievements, is something that all of humanity aspires to. Technology is by no means the exclusive privilege of any one country. Faced with the United States set on creating hegemony over technology, China is once again being called to defend itself, not with guns and bullets, but rather with “zeros and ones.” Only by making technological advancements can Chinese companies like Huawei defend their own interests, and the interests of China.

180 years ago, British interests attempted to press further into China through the lure of an opium pipe. Today, the United States is using a different opiate. This is the false sense of power and prosperity which nationalism and protectionism claim to provide.

The Chinese people are embarking on a different path the Red Army found itself on more than 80 years ago. The landscape may have changed, but the spirit which drove those Chinese soldiers forward in 1935 can, and will, continue to be found in the Chinese people of today.

Related stories

Share this story on

Columnists

LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.