White Paper Clarifies Facts about China-US Trade Negotiations

China Plus Published: 2019-06-02 23:31:05
Comment
Share
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn

Note: The following article is taken from the Chinese-language "Commentaries on International Affairs".

The Chinese Government issued a white paper on Sunday (June 2) entitled "China’s Position on the China-US Economic and Trade Consultations". The document explains the ins and outs of the trade talks, covering information about the impact of Sino-US economic and trade frictions, how the U.S. side went back on its promises, and China’s principled stance in dealing with the consultations. The white paper is designed to clarify the facts and help the international community gain a full and frank understanding of the situation.

Wang Shouwen, Vice Minister of Commerce and Deputy China International Trade Representative speaks during a press conference of the State Council Information Office to release the White Paper on China's Position on the China-US Economic and Trade Consultations in Beijing, June 2, 2019. [Photo: IC]

Wang Shouwen, Vice Minister of Commerce and Deputy China International Trade Representative speaks during a press conference of the State Council Information Office to release the White Paper on China's Position on the China-US Economic and Trade Consultations in Beijing, June 2, 2019. [Photo: IC]

Over the past year or so, China and the United States have held 11 rounds of high-level consultations and made substantial progress. However, the U.S. has repeatedly imposed tariffs and has blamed China for the sense of frustration in the negotiations, with the intention of putting extreme pressure on China to seek absolute interests, while deceiving the international community.

In order to safeguard the right of the Chinese people to develop economically, the Chinese side has always been restrained in the course of consultations. But, this does not mean that China will accept any unreasonable demands or "mud-slinging" by the U.S. This white paper aims to offer the world the true situation of the Sino-US economic and trade consultations, and to demonstrate once again China's determination not to back down on major issues of principle, in the hope that those who are addicted to the use of extreme pressure will give up their illusions as soon as possible.

Specifically, the 8000-character-long white paper focuses on establishing three essential truths about the Sino-US trade talks:

First of all, the consultations have suffered severe setbacks because the U.S. government has “backtracked on its commitments” to consultations.

The white paper reviews the three times when the U.S. side went back on its promises - in March 2018, May 2018, and May 2019 - pointing out that the U.S. side has “persisted with exorbitant demands, maintained the additional tariffs imposed since the friction began, and has insisted on including mandatory requirements concerning China’s sovereign affairs in the deal, which only served to delay the resolution of remaining differences.” The U.S. has irresponsibly accused China of “backtracking on its position,” attempting to shift the blame for the so far inconclusive talks onto China, and looking for an excuse to impose more tariffs. However, the fact is that “the more the U.S. government is offered, the more it wants.” In defense of its own interests, China has been forced to take measures in response.

Secondly, China achieved technological breakthroughs by means of innovation and diligence, not by theft or robbery.

Intellectual property theft and forced technology transfer are the major excuses used by the United States to initiate the trade war against China. During multiple rounds of negotiations, the US has consistently expressed major concern over these issues. The white paper clarifies the issue by incorporating plentiful statistics, citing views of such institutions like the US Chamber of Commerce, and explaining what China has done to protect intellectual property and guard against forced technology transfer. It shows that the US accusations are utterly unfounded and Washington is acting arbitrarily by slapping increased tariffs and imposing investment restrictions.

Thirdly, raising tariffs benefits no one and certainly has not made America great again.

The US government claims that raising tariffs will lead to a narrower trade deficit with China and greater economic growth for the US. But the truth is that, in 2018, the US commodity trade deficit with China expanded by 11.6% from a year earlier, while US soybean and auto exports to China plummeted by 50% and over 20% respectively. Citing research results from US institutions and the IMF, the white paper provides evidence on how the increased tariffs have elevated production costs for US businesses, raised consumer prices for US households, put the brake on the US economy, and placed a lid on US exports to China. Worse still, the increased tariffs also pose a challenge to global economic recovery, taking the wind out of the sails of economic globalization. The US suggestion that the trade war has made America great again is a false statement.

The white paper also stresses China’s principles in the trade negotiations, namely that both sides should push forward with consultations based on good faith and credibility in a spirit of respect, equality and mutual benefit. China will not backdown on major issues of principle, which means these principles must be respected in order for the negotiations to continue. It also means that any trade deal that both sides were to agree to must be based on equality and mutual benefit. The white paper makes it clear that “one prerequisite for a trade deal is that the US should remove all additional tariffs imposed on Chinese exports and that China’s purchase of US goods should be realistic while ensuring that a proper balance in the text of the agreement is achieved to serve the common interests of both sides.”

Forced to play defense in a trade war, China has consistently called for dialogue and reason to resolve differences and address the trade disputes. The white paper defines the China-US commercial relationship as “the ballast and the propeller of the overall bilateral relationship.” But negotiations need two willing parties; China and the United States must come together in order for the negotiations to work. China does not want a trade war, but it is not afraid of one. It will fight one if necessary.

China remains committed to its own cause no matter how the external environment changes. The fundamental solution to economic and trade tensions is to grow stronger through reform and opening up.

Related stories

Share this story on

Columnists

LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.