Breakthrough for opening up as China slims negative lists for foreign investment

China Plus Published: 2019-07-01 20:42:47
Comment
Share
Share this with Close
Messenger Messenger Pinterest LinkedIn

Note: The following article is taken from the Chinese-language "Commentaries on International Affairs".

The National Development and Reform Commission and Ministry of Commerce, has released two updated negative lists for this year, allowing foreign investors to take control or sole proprietorship in more fields in China. The unveiling of the new shortened lists took place less than 48 hours after Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke at the G20 Osaka Summit stating that his country would further expand its opening-up process in five respects. The momentum and speed of opening-up clearly demonstrates China’s determination to take action.

Launched in 2013, the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone aims to facilitate more open trade in China, and now hosts 50,000 companies. [Photo: IC]

Launched in 2013, the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone aims to facilitate more open trade in China, and now hosts 50,000 companies. [Photo: IC]

China's new version of the negative lists for foreign investment has three characteristics: First, the number of items off-limits to foreign investment has been cut from 48 down to 40 for nationwide implementation, representing a reduction ratio of 16.7 percent. A separate list governing foreign investment in China's pilot free trade zones, which enjoy a higher degree of openness, has slashed restricted areas from 45 to 37, a reduction of 17.8 percent. Second, China is open to foreign investment in a wide range of sectors, involving agriculture, mining, manufacturing, transportation, value-added telecommunications, infrastructure, and cultural services. Third, the government continues to give free trade zones the ability to develop policy initiatives as early adopters in expanding opening-up, including the removal of restrictions on foreign investment in free trade zones in aquatic products, fishing and publications. China has once again provided reassurance to foreign companies in China through a firm commitment to continually expand its opening-up, and has made new contributions to promoting cooperation in the global industrial value chain.

In recent years, China has been pursuing a policy of “subtraction” in terms of the negative lists for foreign investment access and has promised to completely remove restrictions on foreign investment access outside the negative lists. For example, the negative list of the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone has been shortened from the initial 190 restrictions to the current 37. As a key step in institutional openness, China passed the Foreign Investment Law in March this year, clearly defining intellectual property rights and technology protection for foreign-invested enterprises, their pre-entry national treatment plus a negative list management system, and their investment, revenues and other legal rights in China.

The further expansion of the opening-up process is an inevitability as China seeks high-quality economic development and to increase public benefit. In recent years, China's manufacturing industry has essentially liberalized foreign investment, and the opening up of the service industry is also accelerating. In the first quarter of this year, the added value of China's service industry accounted for 57.3 percent of GDP, which still lags behind that of developed countries whose service sectors usually make up 70 percent of their GDPs. Under the new negative lists, service sectors including shipping agencies, gas and heat pipelines in cities, cinemas, performance brokerage institutions, and value-added telecoms will see ownership restrictions relaxed or removed soon. This will help to improve the level of development of China's related industries, encourage domestic companies to grow stronger in the face of tougher competition, and will help to enhance the sense of well-being and gain among the people.

The new negative lists will clear the way for major new foreign investment in China. At present, foreign companies are responsible for half of China’s foreign trade and account for about a quarter of industrial enterprises above a designated size (those with annual main business revenue of 20 million yuan or more). Take the cancellation of restrictions on foreign ownership of cinemas and performance brokerage institutions as an example. The massive potential offered by China’s market of 1.4 billion people, which already sees annual box office sales worth nearly 60 billion yuan, will not have gone unnoticed by external investors.

Since the beginning of this year, the escalation in trade friction has frequently impacted the global industrial value and supply chains. It is crucial for China, as the world's largest trader of goods and the second largest in terms of service trade, to become a steady influence amid instability and uncertainty. The Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in China recently published a white paper on the Chinese economy and Japanese enterprises in 2019, stating that Japanese companies in China are expecting further opening-up of the Chinese market.

It’s not only Japanese companies that regard the Chinese market as an important support for their global development strategy, with many foreign firms increasing their investment and foothold in China. In addition to the construction this year of Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory, British Telecom has become the first international telecommunications company to obtain a license to operate in China, and UBS AG has achieved absolute control over its Chinese affiliate UBS Securities Co. Ltd. Meanwhile, Allianz (China) insurance holding Co. Ltd. has been given the go ahead to establish China's first foreign insurance holding company, and Standard & Poor's has been cleared to enter the Chinese credit rating market.

The “slimming” of the negative lists for foreign investment access not only demonstrates the increasing momentum of China’s opening-up process, but also provides certainty and policy guarantees for foreign businesses wishing to invest in China, share in the country’s development opportunities, and achieve mutually beneficial and win-win outcomes.

It has been repeatedly proved that no matter how the world changes, China's economy has always remained broad, stable and bright. It is willing to embrace every partner based on the principle of achieving shared growth through consultation and collaboration. On the road to facilitating globalization, China has always been a reliable and trustworthy hard-working partner.

Related stories

Share this story on

Columnists

LU Xiankun Professor LU Xiankun is Managing Director of LEDECO Geneva and Associate Partner of IDEAS Centre Geneva. He is Emeritus Professor of China Institute for WTO Studies of the University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) and Wuhan University (WHU) of China and visiting professor or senior research fellow of some other universities and think tanks in China and Europe. He also sits in management of some international business associations and companies, including as Senior Vice President of Shenzhen UEB Technology LTD., a leading e-commerce company of China. Previously, Mr. LU was senior official of Chinese Ministry of Commerce and senior diplomat posted in Europe, including in Geneva as Counsellor and Head of Division of the Permanent Mission of China to the WTO and in Brussels as Commercial Secretary of the Permanent Mission of China to the EU. Benjamin Cavender Benjamin Cavender is a Shanghai based consultant with more than 11 years of experience helping companies understand consumer behavior and develop go to market strategies for China. He is a frequent speaker on economic and consumer trends in China and is often featured on CNBC, Bloomberg, and Channel News Asia. Sara Hsu Sara Hsu is an associate professor from the State University of New York at New Paltz. She is a regular commentator on Chinese economy. Xu Qinduo Xu Qinduo is CRI's former chief correspondent to Washington DC, the United States. He works as the producer, host and commentator for TODAY, a flagship talk show on current affairs. Mr. Xu contributes regularly to English-language newspapers including Shenzhen Daily and Global Times as well as Chinese-language radio and TV services. Lin Shaowen A radio person, Mr. Lin Shaowen is strongly interested in international relations and Chinese politics. As China is quite often misunderstood in the rest of the world, he feels the need to better present the true picture of the country, the policies and meanings. So he talks a lot and is often seen debating. Then friends find a critical Lin Shaowen criticizing and criticized. George N. Tzogopoulos Dr George N. Tzogopoulos is an expert in media and politics/international relations as well as Chinese affairs. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centre International de Européenne (CIFE) and Visiting Lecturer at the European Institute affiliated with it and is teaching international relations at the Department of Law of the Democritus University of Thrace. George is the author of two books: US Foreign Policy in the European Media: Framing the Rise and Fall of Neoconservatism (IB TAURIS) and The Greek Crisis in the Media: Stereotyping in the International Press (Ashgate) as well as the founder of chinaandgreece.com, an institutional partner of CRI Greek. David Morris David Morris is the Pacific Islands Trade and Investment Commissioner in China, a former Australian diplomat and senior political adviser. Harvey Dzodin After a distinguished career in the US government and American media Dr. Harvey Dzodin is now a Beijing-based freelance columnist for several media outlets. While living in Beijing, he has published over 200 columns with an emphasis on arts, culture and the Belt & Road initiative. He is also a sought-after speaker and advisor in China and abroad. He currently serves as Nonresident Research Fellow of the think tank Center for China and Globalization and Senior Advisor of Tsinghua University National Image Research Center specializing in city branding. Dr. Dzodin was a political appointee of President Jimmy Carter and served as lawyer to a presidential commission. Upon the nomination of the White House and the US State Department he served at the United Nations Office in Vienna, Austria. He was Director and Vice President of the ABC Television in New York for more than two decades.